I’ve seen this play out across hundreds of employee and vendor interactions, and years of scaling a 7-figure service business—no matter the role or industry, the pattern is the same.

This idea came from real operations, not theory. One of my new employees had just started working at an apartment community. He was doing the groundskeeping and thought he was crushing it. The leasing office told him he was doing great. But the maintenance manager kept saying, “He’s not doing anything right. Same trash, same areas, nothing’s changed.”

My employee pushed back: “I checked everything. People told me it was fine. I don’t get it.” That’s when I told him: You have to think like your hater.

Don’t just glance around and assume it’s clean because no one complained. Hunt for the issues. Be proactive. Own it. Over-communicate. Document every step. Because sometimes people won’t point out the exact problem—they’ll just tell you they’re unhappy.

If you want to cut complaints, you have to do the work as if your biggest critic is checking behind you.

Over the years of running a service business at scale and mentoring vendors on our platform, I’ve seen this dynamic play out countless times. It doesn’t matter whether you’re cleaning, coding, consulting, or creating—what separates those who get constant pushback from those who win trust is the same thing: a standard of delivery that leaves no room for doubt.

Assume a hostile quality-assurance check.

A “hater” mindset isn’t about being negative. It’s about holding yourself to the harshest possible standard so your work is bulletproof. You:

Use this 5-step pass before anything leaves your hands.

H — Hunt for friction

-Look for what others might nitpick: overlooked details, missed timelines, unclear scope, or quality issues.

A — Assume the worst interpretation

-Communicate so clearly that even a skeptic can’t twist your words. Add proof—photos, notes, examples.

T — Triple-check the essentials

-Verify the little things that usually get you in trouble: typos, totals, permissions, missed spots.

E — Evidence everything

-Show your work. Photos of completed tasks, changelogs, timestamps—so if someone questions you, you already have receipts.

R — Report proactively

-Don’t wait until the end. Send updates as you go: “Task A done, here’s proof. Now moving to Task B.

Back to my groundskeeper: I told him not to just say “I did X, Y, Z” at the end of the day. Instead:

Now, if the manager has a complaint, he has to point to the specific area—because the employee already showed proof of every other one. Suddenly, the narrative shifts. The employee is no longer “defensive”—he’s proactive, detailed, and trustworthy.

This mindset isn’t just for cleaning or maintenance. It applies in every job, every industry, and with every client:

Consulting: Share progress memos, document decisions, and provide receipts for time and deliverables.

Creative work: Send drafts with notes on what changed, why you made certain choices, and how feedback was addressed.

Tech & startups: Log updates in changelogs, provide edge-case notes, and send proactive risk call-outs.

Customer service: Over-communicate with follow-ups, track tickets, and give timestamped receipts for resolutions.

Wherever there’s a client, a boss, or a stakeholder—there’s someone who could nitpick. The HATER framework makes you unshakable in any context.

It’s like cleaning when your biggest hater is checking behind you. You don’t just sweep the obvious—you check corners, baseboards, and behind doors.

In business, that means:

✅Clear file names, no version confusion.

✅Screenshots to show before/after.

✅Logs of what changed, when, and why.

✅Updates that leave no room for doubt.

Sometimes the friction is personal. But you can still neutralize it.

✅Stick to receipts. Facts, photos, timestamps.

✅Shorten cycles. Frequent updates leave less room for assumptions.

✅Shift the medium. If emails get misread, do a 10-minute walkthrough; if meetings get heated, follow up in writing.

✅Define acceptance criteria. Ask: “What 3 things would you need to see to call this complete?” Then deliver exactly that—documented.

✅Score each 0–2 (0 = missing, 1 = partial, 2 = airtight). Aim for 8+/10 before shipping.

✅Hunt for friction (did I list likely complaints?)

✅Assume worst interpretation (is it impossible to misread?)

✅Triple-check essentials (no missed spots/details?)

✅Evidence everything (photos, logs, receipts?)

✅Report proactively (updates sent before asked?)

👉 If this mindset resonated, you’ll love my newsletter Alternative Programming — where I share weekly lessons on mindset, systems, and scaling. Subscribe here → https://alternative-programming.beehiiv.com

📬 Get Weekly Insights: Join Alternative Programming

🌐 Share Your Story: Use #StrongerTogether

📱 Follow for Daily Tips: @alternativeprogramming

Building success together,

John Thomas

P.S. Don't want to miss next week's insights on veteran organizations? Subscribe now to get it directly in your inbox.